All right folks, now that my sickness has subsided I can finally bring to you my blog post. Google defines treaties as "formal and systematical." I can not see The Grapes of Wrath as a treatises. While it does have many underlying principles that are brought to light about the Dust Bowl and the 1930's but a treatises should be something more accurate such as a news paper article or a scholarly essay. The Grapes of Wrath seems to be more of novel which can integrate fiction with fact.
What do you think? Is there enough fact in The Grapes of Wrath to be considered a treatises?
No comments:
Post a Comment